Tribunal issues ruling that Internet Spy Dean Steacy has to return to witness stand to answer questions on possible entrapment of
Next hearing date:
Canadian Human Rights Tribunal
Against the vigorous chest-beating of the Canadian Human Rights Commission, Attorney General of Canada, Richard Warman and the B’nai Brith Group (Canadian Jewish Congress and Simon Wiesenthal Centre), on
1) The Respondent [
2) The Tribunal will now allow the issuance of the subpoena for Bell Canada that the Respondent had previously requested, but which the Tribunal had at that time denied given the then pending s. 37 objections of the Commission (see Warman v. Lemire,
2007 CHRT 21).
Ruling on August 8, 2007 motion (just ruled on now)
1) With regard to the documents referred to in paragraphs 2, 3, and 4, the Respondent will be permitted to enter them as exhibits, at the
2. Documents disclosed by the Commission on July 6,2007 as a result of testimony about them given by
access to Internet sites without going to a Tribunal.
3. Documents disclosed by the Commission on July 6,2007 pursuant to the
Commission's undertaking to search for correspondence between the Commission and ISP's that had been missed. [By the original CHRT ruling]
4. Pursuant to the Commission's undertaking to do a further review of Harvey Goldberg's email with respect to "hate", a number of documents were disclosed under cover letter dated July 31, 2007 which the respondent wishes to rely upon in the constitutional argument. These documents consist in the main of emails to or from
Canadian Human Rights Commission Internet Spying Apparatus Exposed!
Section 37 allows the government to conceal any disclosure of information that they claim will injure security and hurt the “operations of the Canadian Human Rights Commission” and reveal it’s “investigation techniques.” The only way to challenge a Section 37 invocation is for the victim to appeal, within 10 days, to the Federal Court of Canada. Against all odds .. that’s exactly what
The CHRC hoped that
First the CHRC went to the Canadian Human Rights Tribunal, and in lengthy motions, demanded the case against Lemire and the Constitutional Challenge not wait for the Federal Court and the Tribunal should order Final arguments BEFORE the Federal Court had ruled. This would make sure that whatever came out at Federal Court would not have been part of the Constitutional Challenge or the case being forwarded by Lemire.
The Tribunal would not go for that, and ruled that the case against Lemire would be stopped “Sine Die” until after the Federal Court of Canada ruled.
Then the CHRC tried to deplete all the resources and grind down
The new plan was to give triple-hearsay evidence in hopes of stopping the Federal Court appeal. In December 2007, a letter came from CHRC counsel –
Undeterred by the CHRC’s political shell game, off to the Federal Court of Canada the defence team went in January 2008. At this point, the CHRC was so scared of losing the ability to ever claim Section 37, they withdrew almost every objection they made under Section 37. By withdrawing the objections, the Federal Court of Canada no longer had any jurisdiction to rule on the judicial review brought by
The day after the Federal Court of Canada victory, it was made public that not only had 007 Dean Steacy (licensed to CHILL) tried to entrap
Now, back to the Tribunal the defence team went. With defeat in the air, the entire gaggle of Section 13 enforcers had closed ranks and wanted to make sure Lemire was not allowed to recall the witnesses or bring forth any more evidence on the spying operations of the CHRC. During a conference call with all parties, the tribunal stuck it on
The Section 13 pre-crime enforcers were in near hysterics to make sure no further evidence was submitted by the Lemire defence team. The CHRC after being smoked at the tribunal and at Federal Court on this issue .. were doing their usual song-and-dance two-step. Again the Lemire defence team was supposed to accept some obscene triple-hearsay letter from
With the Tribunal’s ruling of
Canadian “Human Rights” Commission senior investigator conducts spying operation against the Conservative Website FreeDominion.ca
The dark plot of the CHRC’s Agent Provocateur agenda Exposed!
Chronology of CHRC’s Dean Steacy on FreeDominion
April 5, 2006
Dean Steacy signs up the account “Jadewarr” on FreeDominion.ca and logs in. Uses the official E-
April 19, 2006
A message posted to FreeDominion which forms the basis of a complaint before the Canadian Human Rights Commission filed by
September 29, 2006
The actual complaint by Gentes is received by the Canadian Human Rights Commission. Complaint investigated by Sandy Kozak
Rest of the story on FD here: http://www.freedomsite.org/legal/jan18-08_FreeDominion_and_CHRC.html