Saturday, December 29, 2007

Marc Lemire's Appeal to the Federal Court of Canada - January 15, 2008

Marc Lemire’s Appeal to the Federal Court of Canada

January 15, 2008 – 9:30am.  Toronto, Ontario

 

For the first time ever in history, the Canadian Human Rights Commission is being challenged by Marc Lemire in the Federal Court of Canada for it’s spying operations, abuses of the law, deception and Agent Provocateur agenda.

 

Like some mobster in a U.S. trial who keep invoking the Fifth Amendment, the CHRC is trying to keep the veil of secrecy wrapped tight around its spying operations on Canadian Internet dissidents. It’s tool of choice is Section 37 of the Canada Evidence Act. This allows government representatives the ability to prevent disclosure (hide) and claim immunity over the disclosure of information that the CHRC alleges to be injurious to Canadian Government security and operations of a Federal agency. The evidence Marc Lemire is challenging before the Federal Court is explosive and will blow the whole agenda of the CHRC into the open.

 

In a 300 page record, prepared by lead counsel Barbara Kulaszka, the abuse of Section 37 by the Commission was laid out in amazingly clear detail.  Those 300 pages decimate the Canadian Human Rights Commission’s claims and expose the spying operations of Canada’s Thought Control apparatus

 

Come out and see the top freedom fighters in Canada battle the censors 

Barbara Kulaszka, Douglas Christie, Paul Fromm and Marc Lemire

 

 

 

MapFederal Court

of Canada

 

January 15, 2008

9:30am

 

180 Queen Street W

 Toronto, Ontario

 

 

Case: T-860-07

 

Marc Lemire

 

Vs.

 

Richard Warman, Canadian Human Rights Commission and Attorney General of Canada.

 

 

 

 

Thursday, December 27, 2007

Canadian "Human Rights" Commission finds promotion of "Hate" by RCMP - No Problem

Canadian “Human Rights” Commission finds promotion of “Hate” by RCMP - No Problem

CHRC proceeds only against White working-class victims

On August 14th, 2006, the Canadian Human Rights Commission (CHRC) found that there was no problem with officers from the Royal Canadian Mounted Police sending messages that would "likely expose" First Nations persons and White persons to hatred and/or contempt, contrary to section 13(1) of the Canadian Human Rights Act.

Some of the hate messaging by RCMP officers include:

  • "curb-stomping Whities," slapping women and shaking babies.”
  • “The RCMP is always chasing me/Cause I’m a smelly fucking native and I can’t even see”,
  • “The RCMP's always chassing me, cause I stole six cases of Mr. Clean. The RCMP's always chasing me / because I stink”

This decision comes on a heels of a August 10th, 2006, ruling by the Canadian Human Rights Commission to allow officers from the Edmonton Police to post hate messages on the Stormfront.Org website. Included in those posts by an Edmonton Police Officer were: “how can u hold the little redskin responsible he's only an animal...” and “With any luck they will end up like the nogs in the states who predominantly kuill each other.”

The Canadian “Human Rights” Commission never bothered to conduct a proper investigation or even contact the RCMP for their side of the complaint. Instead, the complaint was swept under the rug. Unlike White working class individuals who the CHRC obsessively harass with a vengeance, the RCMP are not the preferred targets of the politically correct enforcers.

Acting like typical anti-freedom dictators, Marc Lemire hit a road block at every turn while trying to file the complaint. It took almost a dozen e-mails and faxes to get any action from the Commission, including a letter that had to be written to the head of the CHRC. Contrast that to the treatment other complainants have received which includes the Commission even writing up the complaint for them! In my case, the complaint was returned because Dean Steacy – "Human Rights" Investigator - claims it was “double-sided” even though it had been faxed!

The real reason the CHRC doesn't’ want to accept my complaint is because they are only interested in persecuting working-class whites with limited or no means of being able to defend themselves. .

Of the 30 or more cases involving infractions of Section 13 of the Canadian Human Rights Act (hate messaging) every single one of them involves a respondent that is: White, working-class, and with no means to properly defend themselves. Starting with John Ross Taylor, Tony Macleer, Marc Lemire, Melissa Guille, Eldon Warman, Fred Kyburz and every single person EVER brought before a tribunal has been white, poor and with limited resources.

The Canadian Human Rights Commission is not impartial. Instead, it is motivated by an anti-Majority political agenda. It refuses to accept complaints against police promoting hate, has yet to respond to repugnant Gangsta rap and ignores sites that promote hatred against Majority groups such as Whites and Christians, The makes a farce of the CHRC supposed mandate of fighting "racism" and "discrimination."

What is the Canadian "Human Rights" Tribunal?



The Canadian "Human Rights" Tribunal at previous hearings has ruled:

-Truth is no defence

-Intent is no defence

-Fair comment is no defence


In fact there are ZERO defences available!

-Any evidence is allowed (hearsay, double hearsay)

-It does not need to show any proof of actual harm caused by the things that have generated complaints.

-The standard of proof is very low and is based on a “balance of probabilities,” not “beyond a reasonable doubt” as is in a criminal cases.

The Canadian "Human Rights" Tribunal can:

  • Issue a Cease and Desist (C&D) order:

An order that is enforceable by the Federal Court of Canada. The C&D order can be very broad and literally silence the person against whom it was issued. If disobeyed, the individual can face up to FIVE years in Prison (Federal court Rules – Rule 472) [John Ross Taylor spent one year in jail

  • Assess fines and award “special compensation” to the complainant:

-Fines: Can award up to $10,000 in penalties [Sec 53(3)]

-“Special Compensation”: Up to $20,000 to compensate "victim" [Sec 60(f)]

-Up to $20,000 for “willful or reckless discrimination” [Sec 60(g)]

-All fines have outrageous interest rates applied if not paid immediately

Stand up and help us fight the Canadian Human rights Commission and expose its anti-Majority agenda! Don't let it take away our democratic right to free expression. http://www.freedomsite.org/

CHRC Abuse of Section 37 of the Canada Evidence Act to cover-up the misdeeds of the CHRC

CHRC Abuse of Section 37 of the Canada Evidence Act to cover-up the misdeeds of the CHRC


It’s all out war in the Marc Lemire Internet case. The Canadian Human Rights Commission, like some mobster in a U.S. trial who keep invoking the Fifth Amendment, is trying to keep the veil of secrecy wrapped tight around its spying operations on Canadian Internet dissidents. It’s tool of choice is Section 37 of the Canada Evidence Act.

Section 37 reads:

A Minister of the Crown in right of Canada or other official may object to the disclosure of information before a court, person or body with jurisdiction to compel the production of information by certifying orally or in writing to the court, person or body that the information should not be disclosed on the grounds of a specified public interest. If an objection is made under subsection (1), the court, person or body shall ensure that the information is not disclosed other than in accordance with this Act.”

“Public interest” is a sweeping catch-all and can include the safety of any person. The mischievous effect of invoking these magic words – “Section 37” – is that the information cannot be revealed or the question even asked. The only route of appeal is to a Federal Court and that’s where the Marc Lemire Defence Team is now headed.

Cover-up? You bet!

We know, according to Richard Warman’s testimony in Warman v. Jessica Beaumont that a page was downloaded from Stormfront using the sign-in name ”Jadewarr.” Warman testified that he was not “Jadewarr” but that the document was downloaded in his presence by the Commission. When Marc Lemire’s attorney Barbara Kulaszka asked CHRC investigator Dean Steacy whether he knew who “Jadewarr” was, Commission lawyer Giacomo Vigna squelched as answer by invoking Sec. 37.

Similarly, when Miss Kulaszka asked Mr. Steacy whether he’d ever signed on to a political message board and made postings, Mr. Vigna used Sec. 37 to prevent an answer. We know that “Jadewarr” extensively discussed Sec. 13.1 complaints with people on Stormfront and has even tried to engage victim/Respondent Marc Lemire in conversations – perhaps to entrap him?

The Member (Judge) in this Tribunal lawyer Athanasios Hadjis of Montreal expressed serious reservations at Vigna’s wholesale use of Sec. 37 and all but invited the Defence to challenge Vigna in Federal Court: “Don't say it's privilege. It's not privilege, it's 37. It is a large tool that you have chosen to use, and I hope that one day the Federal Court has a chance to assess it.”

Quotes from Member (Judge) in the Marc Lemire case

Athanasios Hadjis

I am asking for some discretion to be utilized by the single party that has this tool in this room.

Transcripts, Page 4429

MR. VIGNA: Mr. Chair, I would raise an objection, again, in terms of the relevance, and also under section 37. This is an ongoing investigation, so section 37 would be --

…..

MS KULASZKA: I don't think that question in any way threatens the Commission.

THE CHAIRPERSON: No, it doesn't. I am going to allow that question. If there is a problem with that, ask somebody upstairs.

Transcripts, Page 4714

But I see your point, Ms Kulaszka. You want to know, if you resolve on 52, is 37 still -- is that sword of Damocles still hanging over your head.

Transcripts, Page: 4388

Amazingly, in the Warman v. Glenn Bahr and Western Canada for Us Tribunal, when Paul Fromm asked Sgt. Stephen Camp whether “Estate” was an Edmonton Police Officer, Sec. 37 was not invoked. Camp eventually admitted “Estate” who had posted inflammatory and racist comments on Stormfront was a police officer. [Subsequently, in Glenn Bahr’s preliminary hearing on Sec. 319 – “hate” – charges, Camp came clean and admitted he was “Estate”]

In the Bahr case, acting as his agent, I originally asked, about the identity of “Estate.” There was a bit of an argument. Camp refused to answer. Vigna them talked about "Section 38 of the Canada Evidence Act" but did not invoke it. More discussion ensued over whether the question was relevant. After it was ruled relevant by Tribunal Charperson Julie Lloyd, Camp returned to testify on the following Monday. During Constable Camps testimony, he revealed that “Estate” was an Edmonton police officer, but refused to identify which officer it was.

The only reference to Section 37 came from. RICHARD WARMAN who said this:

MR. WARMAN: -- the last point I would make is that Sergeant Camp over the break has had an opportunity to speak with his colleagues and superiors at the Edmonton Police Service as well as others -- I won't go into -- he has had a chance to confirm that there are no further ongoing issues in relation to -- we won't be continuing with the Section 37 Canada Evidence Act objection. ( Warman v. Bahr and Western Canada for Us transcript, page 683)

Interestingly, Warman doesn't continue the objection!!! Objections under Section 37 of the Canada Evidence Act can only be invoked and certified by “A Minister of the Crown in right of Canada or other official” Just what on earth is going on here? Does Richard Warman represent a Minister of the Crown or other official? If so why it this not revealed? During most of the testimony Richard Warman has done, he has testified he is doing this on his own initiative, and has no “special relationship” with the Canadian Human Rights Commission.

We are battling a secrecy obsessed Canadian Human Rights Commission bent on throttling dissent on the Internet and equally determined to keep Canadians in the dark about their spy operations. They have all the money and resources. We need your help in this ongoing battle.

Paul Fromm

Director

CANADIAN ASSOCIATION FOR FREE EXPRESSION

With edits and content changes by Marc Lemire


CHRC and their relationship with Canadian Police Agencies EXPOSED!

Canadian Human Rights Commission and their relationship with Canadian Police Agencies

EXPOSED!

Since 2005, the Canadian Human Rights Commission has been secretly expanding their powers into the realm of law enforcement under the guise of “fighting hate”. The thought control maniacs at the CHRC, using Communist style tactics, have been trying to elevate themselves into the level of some sort of National Security Agency.

Unlike Police agencies – the Commission has absolutely no authority to engage in any form of spying operations on Canadian citizens. Yet, through a series of relationships with police agencies they have unprecedented access to Police databases containing the most sensitive and private police files on Canadians.

On May 10, 2007, head internet investigator for the CHRC Dean Steacy admitted, under examination by Barbara Kulaszka , that the Commission has an arrangement with Canadian Police Agencies. When Barbara Kulaszka asked what exactly the arrangement was, Giacomo Vigna for the CHRC invoked Section 37 of the Canada Evidence Act to stop dead all questioning.


Nothing should scare freedom loving Canadians more than the politically motivated thought control apparatus of the Canadian Human Rights Commission having any access to the most sensitive and private information of millions of Canadians.

Recently, it was revealed that the CHRC currently has “indirect” access to the Police CPIC database. CPIC is the acronym for Canadian Police Information

Centre. CPIC is a highly secured computer based police information system.

CPIC contains records such as:

· Home address

· vehicle information,

· dental records,

· identifying marks/scars,

· firearms ownership,

· criminal records,

· fingerprints,

· current surveillance information,

· known aliases,

· medical conditions

· and much more.

The CHRC has numerous times relied on police agencies to analyze data captured in the execution of search warrants on trumped-up alleged criminal “hate” (Sec. 319 of Criminal Code) violations – yet the victims are very rarely ever charged. Instead the evidence seized is later used before Canadian Human Rights Tribunal hearings through testimony given by Police Officers.

We only know the tip of this unholy alliance between the Police and the CHRC. The Federal Court Appeal by Marc Lemire should bring more evidence into the open.

Covert operations on Canadians are no only conducted by the Canadian Human Rights Commission, but also by those that use the Canadian Human Rights Act for possible political means.

Stormfront Infiltrators Exposed:

1:

Stormfront Alias: Estate

Real name: Sgt. Stephen Camp of the Edmonton Police “Hate Crimes” unit

2:

Stormfront Alias: MarkW14

Real Name: Shane Ruttle Martinez (Anti-Racist Action thug, and CHRC witness)

3:

Stormfront Alias: Pogue Mahone

Real name: Richard Warman

4:

Stormfront Alias: Jadewarr

Real name: CHRC Employee

The misnamed Canadian “Human Rights” Commission has been using tax-payers dollars to fund their political vendetta against individuals and websites they hate.

Websites such as The Freedomsite (http://www.freedomsite.org/) – have been the focus of a 3 year legal attack by the Commission to shut it down, over documents such as “The Immigrant Poem”, criticism of immigration and even the awful “hateful” act of posting an unedited copy of the Canadian Human Rights Act on the Freedomsite!

The Commission and complainant Richard Warman are seeking a LIFETIME speech ban placed on Freedomsite webmaster, Marc Lemire along with hefty fines

In what best can be described as sheer lunacy, the CHRC (with ONLY remedial powers and NO police powers) has attempted to elevate itself to the level of a CSIS (National Security Agency), in an ongoing infiltration operation, using shady and secretive tactics to silence and possibly entrap those they don't like. The operatives of the CHRC have said they must get those they don't like "by any means necessary"

Sgt. Stephen Camp of the Edmonton Police “Hate Crimes” unit posting on Stormfront:

· “Anybody read the Edmonton Journal dated January 22? I know it's a kike publication but...”

· With any luck they will end up like the nogs in the states who predominantly kuill each other.”

· In Reference to Native people he wrote: “retarded little ch-g” and "how can u hold the little redskin responsible he's only an animal..."

· “Our corrupt government is nothing but a puppet to this so called multicultural agenda.”

· “This post again re emphasises the point that our tax dollars are waisted on keeping Zundel behind bars, while Muslim extremists are allowed re entry into Canada and free to come and go as they please.

Infiltration Techniques Taught by Jewish Groups to numerous Canadian Police Services

Infiltration of websites such as Stormfront is part of an organized and darker tactic that is now employed by politicized Police agencies and censorship enforcers. The Friends of Simon Wiesenthal Center for Holocaust Studies is now offering a new course aimed at Canadian Law enforcement agencies and "investigators" entitled "Investigating Internet Extremism". According to the Wiesenthal Centre’s website:

"The workshop works from the premise that in order for law enforcement to be effective in the arena of hate, it must be proactive rather than reactive." The course description continues "Investigating Internet Hate consists of three components; namely infiltration, Internet tools and legalities. In the first section, police officers are introduced to the most frequented web forums, allowing them to become ‘part of the community’ and investigate varying groups and their activities." [Emphasis added] (Copied from Wiesenthal website: http://www.fswc.ca/)

Among some of the Police forces that the Wiesenthal Centre list as recipients of their "training" includes: Ontario Provincial Police, Owen Sound Police Service, Kingston Police Service, Ottawa Police Service, Barrie Police and the Vancouver Police Service.

Tactics used by police officers, to identify and provide evidence before Canadian Human Rights Tribunal hearings:

  • Police powers of search and seizure of computers and other items
  • Search warrants on peoples homes
  • Motor Vehicle Record searches,
  • CPIC, (Canadian Police Information Centre) searches
  • Telephone record searches,
  • Infiltration of Stormfront using false identities
  • Infiltration of internet based mailing lists
  • Assuming phony identities via e-mail
  • Interrogations after arrest
  • Infiltration of public meetings / demonstrations
  • Tenancy Agreements from Landlords

Police have testified against at a CHRT hearing:

Alexan Kulbashian (Officer Terry Wilson testified)

James Richardson (Officer Terry Wilson testified)

Kouba (Officer Camp testified)

Glenn Bahr (Officer Camp testified)

CHRC victims – raided by Police:

Alexan Kulbashian

James Richardson

Glenn Bahr

Ciarian Donnelly

Jessica Beaumont

Terry Tremaine

Criminally charged:

Alexan Kulbashian (charges later dropped)

James Richardson (charges dropped later)

Glenn Bahr (Section 319 charges outstanding)

Above information is based on a study of all Canadian Human Rights Tribunal Section 13 published decisions since 1992.